dev-data
Source: skills/dev-data/SKILL.md
Data pipelines, ETL/ELT design, quality validation, SQL optimization, and analysis.
데이터 파이프라인은 앱 CRUD와 근본적으로 다른 관심사를 가진다: 멱등성, 체크포인트 재시작, 데이터 품질 검증, 배치/스트리밍 선택. 이걸 dev-backend에 포함시키면 일반 API 작업에도 불필요한 ETL 문맥이 로드되고, 파이프라인 작업 시에는 정작 필요한 가이드가 묻힌다. 별도 모듈로 분리해서 데이터 작업의 고유한 원칙을 전면에 놓는다.
LLM은 데이터 처리 코드를 작성할 때 해피 패스만 구현한다. CSV 파일에 빈 행이 있거나, JSON에 예상 못한 null이 있거나, 인코딩이 UTF-8이 아닌 경우를 고려하지 않는다. 이건 LLM이 학습 데이터에서 '깨끗한 예시'를 주로 봤기 때문이다. 실제 데이터는 항상 더럽다. Defensive Parsing 원칙은 '외부 데이터는 null, 잘못된 타입, 추가 컬럼, 누락 컬럼, 인코딩 문제가 전부 있다고 가정하라'고 명시한다.
이 스킬이 해결하는 실제 문제
에이전트가 만드는 파이프라인은 보통 INSERT만 하고 upsert를 안 쓴다. 파이프라인이 실패 후 재시작하면 같은 데이터가 두 번 들어간다. Idempotent Operations 원칙은 모든 파이프라인에 upsert 패턴을 강제한다.
CSV나 JSON을 그냥 읽어서 바로 변환하면, 예상 못한 null, 잘못된 타입, 추가 컬럼이 있을 때 런타임에서 터진다. Schema-First 원칙은 변환 로직 전에 스키마를 먼저 정의하게 한다.
Polars 1.x, DuckDB 1.x가 2024-2025에 크게 바뀌었고, Spark Connect가 등장했다. 에이전트가 2023년 기준으로 pandas만 추천하거나 deprecated API를 쓰는 문제가 있다. tools.md는 현재 도구 비교를 제공하고, 외부 검증을 요구한다.
Triggers: ETL, ELT, pipeline, data quality, SQL optimization, backfill, migration, schema drift
Key Concepts
- Pipeline Thinking (Extract-Transform-Load)
- Schema-First Design
- Defensive Parsing
- Idempotent Operations
- Data Quality Gates
- Batch vs Streaming Architecture
Related Skills
Reference Documents
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Data Governance — PII, Masking, Compliance | PII 분류, 데이터 거버넌스 정책, 규정 준수 가이드 |
| ML Pipeline Engineering | ML 파이프라인 설계, 피처 엔지니어링, 모델 평가 |
| Streaming & Event-Driven Data Patterns | 실시간 스트리밍 아키텍처, Kafka/Flink/Spark Streaming 패턴 |
| Data Processing Tools — pandas vs Polars vs DuckDB | 데이터 도구 비교: pandas, Polars, DuckDB, Spark, dbt |
Sections Overview
| Section | Summary |
|---|---|
| Data Processing Principles | 파이프라인 사고, 스키마 우선, 방어적 파싱, 멱등성, 빠른 실패 원칙. |
| Data Ingestion | CSV/JSON/Parquet/Excel 포맷별 가이드와 증분 로딩 패턴. |
| Data Quality | null/유일성/범위/신선도/행 수 검증과 Dead Letter Queue. |
| SQL Optimization | 인덱스 전략, 쿼리 플랜 분석, N+1 방지, 파티셔닝. |
Academic References
| Paper | Year | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
Designing Data-Intensive Applications (Kleppmann)book | 2017 | exactly-once 시맨틱스, 멱등 쓰기, Avro/Protobuf 스키마 진화의 표준 참고서. |
Official Guides
- Apache Avro Specification — Schema Resolution — reader/writer 스키마 호환성 규칙. 파이프라인 멱등성 설계의 기반.
Full Specification
Show full SKILL.md content
Dev-Data — Data Engineering & Analysis Guide
Production-grade data engineering patterns for building reliable data systems.
Activates by change surface for data pipelines, analytics, SQL-heavy work, schema evolution, backfills, and reporting.
> C0/C1 work (small local patches): See dev §0.0 Work Classifier + §0.1 Patch Fast-Path before reading references.
When to Activate
- Building data pipelines or ETL/ELT processes
- Processing CSV, JSON, Parquet, or Excel files
- Writing analytical SQL, warehouse/lakehouse queries, or transformation models
- Setting up data quality checks or validation
- Performing data analysis, aggregation, or reporting
- Choosing between batch and streaming architectures
Do not activate for plain app CRUD SQL, OLTP query tuning, or transactional schema design. Route those to dev-backend/references/stacks/database.md. This skill owns analytics, ETL/ELT, pipelines, data quality, and reporting.
External/current data evidence
For current external dataset contracts, source freshness, pipeline/tool version
behavior, provider data API changes, or public benchmark/source claims, read the
active search skill and follow its query-rewrite, source-fetch, and
evidence-status rules. Use browser fetch/open/text/get-dom/snapshot only after
candidate URLs exist and the claim needs browser-verifiable source evidence.
---
Pre-Flight Checklist
Before delivering:
- [ ] Input contract defined: source, schema, expected columns/types, and owner
- [ ] Pipeline is idempotent and restartable from the last successful checkpoint
- [ ] Data-quality checks cover nulls, uniqueness, ranges, freshness, and row counts
- [ ] Volume and latency justify the chosen engine: pandas, Polars, DuckDB, SQL warehouse, Spark/Flink
- [ ] Invalid records have a dead-letter/quarantine path with enough context to debug
- [ ] PII/governance classification is complete or delegated to
dev-security/§7 - [ ] Output format and downstream contract are explicit
---
1. Data Processing Principles
Five rules that apply to every data task:
| Principle | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Pipeline thinking | Every pipeline is Extract → Transform → Load. Keep each stage as an independent, testable function. |
| Schema-first | Define expected columns, types, and constraints BEFORE writing transformation logic. |
| Defensive parsing | External data will have nulls, wrong types, extra columns, missing columns, and encoding issues. Assume all of these. |
| Idempotent operations | Running the same pipeline twice on the same input must produce the same output. Use upsert patterns, not blind inserts. |
| Fail fast, fail loud | Raise errors at pipeline boundaries immediately. Internal transforms propagate errors; dead-letter queues handle row-level quarantine at the boundary (see §3). |
---
2. Data Ingestion Patterns
Format-Specific Guidance
| Format | Best For | Watch Out For |
|---|---|---|
| CSV | Simple tabular data, human-readable | Encoding (UTF-8 BOM), delimiter ambiguity, multiline values, inconsistent quoting |
| JSON | Nested structures, API responses | Large files (stream, don't load all at once), deeply nested objects, encoding |
| Parquet | Large analytical datasets, columnar queries | Requires library support, not human-readable, schema evolution |
| Excel | Business user handoffs | Multiple sheets, merged cells, formulas vs. values, date formatting |
| Database | Production system access | Connection pooling, query timeouts, use read replicas for analytics |
Incremental Loading
For large or frequently updated data sources:
- Use a watermark column (e.g.,
updated_at,id) to track the last processed record. - Store the watermark after successful load. On failure, restart from the last saved watermark.
- Process in batches (tune based on source limits and memory), not all-at-once.
- Validate row counts:
loaded_rowsshould equalsource_rows_since_watermark.
Schema Validation on Ingest
Before any transformation, validate incoming data:
✅ Check: Expected columns exist
✅ Check: Data types match (string, number, date, boolean)
✅ Check: Required fields are not null
✅ Check: Values are within expected ranges
✅ Check: No unexpected duplicate keys
❌ Fail: If any check fails, write to error log with row details. Don't silently drop.
---
3. ETL/ELT Pipeline Design
Layer Architecture
Rules:
- Keep staging immutable. Copy first, transform in a separate step — this enables replay and debugging.
- One transformation per step. Don't combine cleaning + joining + aggregating in one function. Chain separate steps.
- Incremental processing. Process only new/changed records when possible. Full reloads only when schema changes.
dbt Integration Patterns
Engine landscape (verified 2026-07-02): dbt Core remains the default; dbt Fusion
is the separately-documented/licensed current engine (check its feature matrix and
license before adopting); SQLMesh is a credible active alternative with plan/apply
workflows. Choose per license posture and team workflow — do not assume Fusion pricing
without a primary source.
When using dbt for transformations, follow the staging → intermediate → mart layer architecture:
Rules:
- Staging models: rename, cast, filter NULLs — no joins, no business logic
- Intermediate models: joins across staging, deduplication, business transforms
- Mart models: aggregations, final business entities consumed by BI/analytics
- Every model has a
schema.ymlwith tests (not_null, unique, relationships, custom SQL). - Run validation tests in CI and after significant changes — treat test failures as pipeline failures.
- Use
dbt source freshnessto monitor upstream data staleness
Error Handling in Pipelines
| Scenario | Pattern |
|---|---|
| Invalid records | Write to dead-letter table/file for manual review. Preserve every record for debugging. |
| Source unavailable | Retry with exponential backoff (1s, 2s, 4s). Alert after 3 failures. |
| Schema mismatch | Halt pipeline. Log expected vs. actual schema. Don't attempt partial loads. |
| Duplicate records | Use upsert (INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE) or deduplicate with window functions. |
Orchestration Basics
When pipelines have multiple steps with dependencies:
- Define tasks as a DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph). Each task depends on its upstream tasks.
- Each task must be independently retryable. If step 3 fails, you restart step 3, not step 1.
- Set reasonable retries (2-3) with delay (5 min between attempts).
- Add timeout per task to prevent hung pipelines.
- Alert on failure: email, Slack, or monitoring dashboard.
---
4. Data Quality
Validation Checks
Run these after every pipeline step, not just at the end:
| Check | What It Validates | Example | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not null | Required fields have values | WHERE order_id IS NULL → 0 rows | |
| Unique | No duplicates on key columns | COUNT(*) = COUNT(DISTINCT id) | |
| Range | Numeric values within bounds | amount BETWEEN 0 AND 1,000,000 | |
| Categorical | Values in allowed set | status IN ('pending', 'active', 'closed') | |
| Freshness | Data is recent enough | MAX(updated_at) > NOW() - INTERVAL '24 hours' |
| Row count | No unexpected data loss or explosion | Within ±10% of previous run |
| Referential | Foreign keys point to existing records | customer_id EXISTS IN customers |
Quality Tool Integration
Use a layered quality strategy — different tools at different pipeline stages:
| Ingest | Great Expectations | Validate raw data against expectations before staging |
| Transform | dbt tests | Assert model-level quality (not_null, unique, relationships, custom SQL) |
| Production | Soda / Monte Carlo | Real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, SLA enforcement |
Validate data dimensions: completeness, uniqueness, range, format, referential integrity, freshness.
Rule: Run validation on every pipeline step — skipping "because the data looks fine" leads to silent downstream corruption.
Data Contracts
For datasets shared between teams, define a contract:
A data contract must include:
- name, owner, version
- schema: column name, type, nullability, uniqueness, allowed values
- SLA: freshness threshold, minimum completeness percentage
- consumers: list of downstream teams/systems
Changes to a contracted schema require versioning and consumer notification.
---
5. Analysis & Reporting
Always Start with Summary Statistics
Before any deep analysis, provide:
| Metric | What to Report | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Row count | Total records in dataset | ||
| Column inventory | Name, type, null count per column | ||
| Numeric summary | min, max, mean, median, std dev | ||
| Categorical summary | Unique values, top 5 most frequent | ||
| Time range | Earliest and latest timestamp |
| Data quality | Null percentage, duplicate percentage |
Output Formats
| CSV export | Handoff to spreadsheet users, large datasets |
| HTML + charts | Dashboards, visual reports (Chart.js, Mermaid diagrams) |
Statistical Reporting
When analysis involves statistics:
- State the method used and its assumptions.
- Report confidence intervals, not just point estimates.
- Visualize distributions (histograms, box plots), not just averages.
- Distinguish correlation from causation explicitly.
---
6. Architecture Decisions
Batch vs. Streaming
| Condition | Choose |
|---|---|
| Real-time insight required (sub-minute latency) | Streaming (Kafka + Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, or Kafka Streams depending on complexity) |
| Exactly-once semantics needed | Kafka transactional producers + Flink/Spark |
| Latency >1 min acceptable, volume >1TB/day | Distributed batch (Spark, Databricks) |
| Latency >1 min acceptable, volume <1TB/day | Single-node batch (SQL, Python, dbt) |
Default to batch. Streaming adds significant complexity in error handling, state management, and debugging. Only use streaming when latency requirements genuinely demand it.
Streaming Decision Tiers (heuristic guidance)
| Latency Requirement | Framework | Complexity |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-100ms, complex stateful | Apache Flink | High (dedicated cluster) |
| Sub-second, existing Spark infra | Spark Structured Streaming | Medium |
| Sub-second, Kafka-centric | Kafka Streams (embedded library) | Low-Medium |
| Minutes acceptable | Batch with frequent scheduling | Low |
Kafka essentials for data engineers (Kafka 4.x / KRaft era — no ZooKeeper):
- Partition by expected throughput — avoid excessive partitions
- Use Schema Registry for backwards-compatible evolution
- Default to at-least-once delivery + idempotent consumers
- Use exactly-once only for financial/billing (transactional producers + consumers)
- Monitor consumer lag via Prometheus/Grafana
See references/streaming.md for Kafka configuration, CDC patterns, and windowing.
Storage Selection
| Need | Choose |
|---|---|
| SQL analytics, BI dashboards, structured queries | Data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, PostgreSQL) |
| ML training, unstructured data, large-scale storage | Data lake (S3/GCS + Parquet or Delta format) |
| Both SQL and ML needs | Lakehouse (Delta Lake, Apache Iceberg) |
| Real-time key-value lookups, caching | Redis, DynamoDB |
| Graph relationships | Neo4j, Neptune |
Tool Selection
| Category | Options (verified 2026-07-02) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Orchestration | Airflow 3.x (standalone DAG processor; SequentialExecutor removed), Prefect 3, Dagster | ||
| Transformation | dbt Core / dbt Fusion / SQLMesh, Spark, plain SQL | ||
| Streaming | Kafka 4.x (KRaft), Kinesis, Pub/Sub | ||
| Quality | GX Core (Great Expectations' OSS library), dbt tests, Soda Core (data contracts), custom validators | ||
| Monitoring | Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog, Monte Carlo (data observability) |
| Local analysis | DuckDB (in-process SQL), Polars (fast DataFrame), pandas 3.x (exploration/ML) |
Lakehouse format: do NOT assume "Iceberg won" — Delta Lake and Apache Iceberg are both
active; choose by ecosystem (engine/vendor support, catalog, existing stack), not by
mindshare claims.
Tool Decision Matrix
| Factor | pandas | Polars | DuckDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | <100MB, exploration, ML prep | >100MB, batch ETL, performance | SQL analytics, ad-hoc queries |
| Execution | Single-threaded, eager | Multi-threaded Rust, lazy eval | Vectorized, auto disk spill |
| Speed (groupby/join) | Baseline | 5-10x faster | Matches Polars on SQL-native |
| Memory | Full load into RAM | Streaming, lazy chains | Spill-to-disk for out-of-core |
| API style | DataFrame (imperative) | DataFrame (expression-based) | SQL-first |
| ML interop | Excellent (scikit-learn, etc.) | Good (.to_pandas()) | Good (.fetchdf()) |
| File format | CSV, JSON, Excel | CSV, Parquet, Arrow-native | CSV, Parquet, JSON, S3 direct |
Decision rule (HEURISTIC — size bands are guidance, not hard cutoffs):
| Medium (100MB-10GB), batch transforms | Polars |
| SQL-first analytics, any size | DuckDB |
| Blended workflow | Polars transforms, DuckDB aggregations (zero-copy via Arrow) |
See references/tools.md for full patterns and code examples.
See references/ml-pipeline.md for ML training pipelines, experiment tracking (MLflow 3.x), feature stores (Feast), and data versioning (DVC/Delta Lake).
---
7. Data Governance & PII
Data Classification
| Level | Examples | Handling |
|---|---|---|
| Public | Aggregated metrics, public reports | No restrictions |
| Internal | Business KPIs, operational data | Access controls, no external sharing |
| Confidential | Customer data, financial records | Encryption at rest, column-level masking |
| Restricted | SSN, payment data, health records | Tokenization, row-level security, audit logging |
PII Handling Checklist
Before building any pipeline that touches PII:
- [ ] Classify all columns by sensitivity level
- [ ] Apply masking/tokenization for non-production environments (static masking)
- [ ] Implement dynamic masking for production queries (role-based)
- [ ] Set data retention TTL — don't keep PII longer than needed
- [ ] Support right-to-erasure (GDPR Article 17): cascading delete across all pipeline stages
- [ ] Log all PII access for audit trail
- [ ] Mask raw PII values before logs and traces — use structured logging with redaction
GDPR/CCPA Quick Reference
| Requirement | Engineering Pattern |
|---|---|
| Right to erasure | Soft delete → batch purge → propagate to downstream stores including data lake |
| Data minimization | Collect only necessary fields; TTL on non-essential data |
| Consent tracking | Consent event store with versioned preferences; consent-aware pipeline branches |
| Data portability | Standardized export endpoint (JSON/CSV) per user request |
See references/governance.md for detailed implementation patterns, row-level security, and retention policies.
---
8. Query Performance Guidelines
Ownership note: this section covers analytical SQL, warehouse/lakehouse queries, and pipeline transforms. Plain app CRUD SQL, OLTP schema design, and transactional query tuning belong to dev-backend/references/stacks/database.md.
- Every query that runs in production: EXPLAIN ANALYZE before deploy
- Slow query threshold: > 100ms for OLTP, > 5s for OLAP/analytics
- Index strategy: B-tree for equality/range, GIN for array/JSONB, GiST for geo
- Missing index detection:
pg_stat_user_tables→ seq_scan / idx_scan ratio - Partition tables > 10M rows if query patterns allow time-range or hash partitioning
- Never
SELECT *in production code — specify columns
For pipeline observability, follow the OpenTelemetry patterns in dev-backend/references/core/observability.md. Instrument pipeline stages as spans, data quality checks as events.
When pipeline errors surface through APIs, use the AppError taxonomy from dev-backend/SKILL.md §3. Map pipeline failures to appropriate HTTP status codes (422 for validation, 502 for upstream failures, 503 for capacity).
For data API patterns (pagination of large datasets, cursor-based access, streaming responses), see dev-backend/references/core/api-design.md.
---
9. Companion Skills
Data engineering does not exist in isolation. Cross-reference these skills when your pipeline connects to other systems:
| Companion | When to Consult | Key Sections |
|---|---|---|
dev-backend | Exposing data via API, response envelope shape, pagination | §5 API Response Contract, §2 Layered Architecture |
dev-security | PII handling, data classification, access controls, audit logging, input validation policy (per dev-security §10 ownership matrix) | §1 Input Validation, §4 Secrets, §8 Pre-Flight |
dev-testing | Pipeline validation, contract tests for data APIs, CI gates | §2 Backend & API Testing, §3 Contract Testing |
dev-frontend | Downstream reporting/dashboard consumers, data format expectations | §15 Backend Contract & Security Alignment |
Integration patterns:
- Data APIs serving frontend dashboards must use the standard response envelope (
dev-backend§5) - PII pipelines must classify columns and apply masking per
dev-securityguidance before this skill's §7 rules - Data contract changes (§4 Data Contracts) must notify downstream consumers including frontend teams
---